Year: 2003 Genre: Action, Crime, Thriller Director: F. Gary Gray Starring: Mark Wahlberg, Charlize Theron, Donald Sutherland
Description: After being left for dead betrayed in Italy, Charlie Croker and his team plan theft of gold brought against its former ally. Review: A few years ago I saw the new version of the classic sixties Mini Coopers for the first time and I remember how much. Now, two years later it was on TV and I just wanted to know if you still happy as when I saw the film. Well, the answer is Yes, the film is about a group of thieves who make a final in Venice, Italy. This plan is perfect and flawless performance. Bakery and used to work for the rest of their lives. But there is a problem that ignores Someone in their ranks do not like split decision, but wants to keep everything for you, even if it means they will have to kill the crew . However, all but one survived and are looking for revenge. A year later, in Los Angeles this time the surviving team members create a smart and devious plan to steal back the gold and get their revenge against Trai back ... The story itself is, of course, is not very original, which is a remake of the original film in 1969, but has a lot of things to offer to do you forget it. This film is a suspense / action typical, but it is certainly one of the best in its class. This action is very nice, the landscape and Venice are a real eye-candy, the story is good and the special effects are impressive. Although the performance is very good, not only see in a movie action. I must admit that I liked what I saw and give this film a well deserved 7.5/10.
Description: Odd real partner with ulterior motives convince Dr. Alan Grant to go to Isla Sorna (the second Ingen dinosaur lab.) Due to an unexpected landing ... and unexpected new inhabitants on the island. Review: Firstly, the last part of the Jurassic series did not deserve all the bad reviews when it was released. In fact, a lot more enjoyable than the second JP was stupid. Well, the first is the same? Of course not. The original story is easily the best of the three, but it's always an enjoyable movie and far better than what has led believe.The filmmakers were smart to make a short film, I found it. Many people now see dinosaurs, so do not overdo it ... permits, and it is only one and a half hour (with the exception of the closing credits.). Made under this short and sweet film. We saw some new reptiles, there were a few scares, and the beautiful scenery of the jungle (filmed in Hawaii), and have fun - bang - on it. The characters are good, no one is quite annoying as the second film. Sleepy family back together and find a missing teenager. Nothing that.A unfairly maligned a good story and a nice, short evening entertainment is wrong.
Year: 2012 Genre: Horror, Thriller Director: Ole Bornedal Starring: Jeffrey Dean Morgan, Kyra Sedgwick, Natasha Calis
Description: Girl buys antique box at a yard sale, unaware that inside the collectible lives a malicious ancient spirit. girl's father teams with his ex-wife to find a way to end the curse upon their child. Review: The similarity between this film and The Exorcist is evident even from the trailers, so I will not go too far into it. Just suffice to say that possession includes any impact or shock value, The Exorcist has. In short, just not as good film.However in its own right, it is a horror movie pretty competent. The history of the central characters is kind of cliche. Husband and wife divorced, they share the care of the children, theres boyfriend / girlfriend on the new image, etc. This type of setup is always useful when dealing with cluttered up film child. In this way can what is wrong with the child will inevitably be blamed on the fact that the child is just not coping well with the break up of his parents. And thats exactly what happens in possession unless there is something very wrong with the youngest daughter, and has absolutely nothing to do with his parents. Without revealing too much, the youngest daughter plot centers around an old wooden box available at auction yard. Of course, she wants, so she gets it. And there begins to be some pretty strange phenomena, most of which is totally creepy, some types of hokey.All in all I was happy. The film had good pacing, decent acting, and cinematography uncommon. Theres not much I can find fault here. If I had to mention my big gripe about this and similar films, it would be this: I am thrilled about the influx of PG-13 horror movie. I've suspected this because of the need to bring a wider audience (viewers / young people under), and make more money on ticket sales. For this reason, the final product tends to be diluted too much for my taste. Have shown a lot of promise, but I can not help but want writers / director would have pushed the envelope a little more flesh out the story. So, it would have been great. As it is now, Ill just say its a good little thriller. Nothing will be talking about this time next year, but I consider my money well spent.My Rating: 6.5/10
Year: 1994 Genre: Crime, Drama Director: Frank Darabont Starring: Tim Robbins, Morgan Freeman, Bob Gunton
Description: Find consolation and final payment by the actions of two common decency, men's tie on a number of years of imprisonment. Review: Why would I write 234 comments Getting The Shawshank? I'm not sure - almost everything you could possibly say about it is said. But like many other people who have written reviews, I was and I was deeply moved by this simple and clear description of hope and friendship and redemption. The only other movie I've ever seen that effects me as strongly To Kill a Mockingbird. Both films make me feel cleaner for nagki watched them.I do not intend to see this movie at all, I do not like prison movies and I do not normally watch it. I work at a library branch, and one day while I was reviewing The Shawshank Getting one of our older customers, he said to me, 'Whenever I feel down or depressed, I see this movie and watch it and It always makes me feel better. At the time, I thought it was very strange. One day there was nothing on TV besides, I really do not want to look under any circumstances or things that I've seen too many times more. I remembered what he said, so I watched it. I watched it many many times since then, and it is getting better with every action showing.No, no special effects - just in prison uniforms talking to each other.The Getting Shawshank and To Kill a Mockingbird is the best movie I've ever seen. I do not judge it by its technical merits - I do not really care about that. I read that Citizen Kane or The Godfather or this or that movie is the best movie ever made. They can have the best technology or being the most influential films ever made, but not the best. The best movies are the ones hit the soul. It takes a movie like The Shawshank touch Getting soul.
Year: 2002 Genre: Action, Crime, Mystery Director: Doug Liman Starring: Matt Damon, Franka Potente, Chris Cooper
Description: Man taken to a fishing boat, bullet full and without memory, then races to elude assassins and recover from amnesia. Review: I've grown tired of the typical formula spy film as Bond, or young stunt exhibition Triple H. There was a bare handful of spy films that feature relatively realistic spy thrillers, especially recently with concentrations of spectacular films with less material than cotton candy. Besides The Bourne Identity, Ronin is the only other spy recent movie I can think of that is not part of skydiving, bungie jumping, means downhill skiing while shooting many bad guys, laser pens, cars with eviction seats, or silicone breasts women in particular, you'd be vaguely ashamed to say in front of your mother. Most of the shit that goes for espionage film has a plot or reason for existence, other than to meet the quota of explosions and cleavage in order to summer action movie Bourne crowd.While very deep plot to prepare it is consistent and focused. The focus is entirely on Bourne as he is to deal with no memory of the past, continued without knowing why. Some people have complained about being confused by the film. I for one did not need everything written because in many cases, it smacks of unreality in the first place, the essence of espionage making conclusions from very sketchy information. If you can handle a bit of it, you should probably stick to Disney films and explain TV Scooby Doo where everything in the end. We never find out about that the case with Ronin and I can not live without some information to be filled in Bournes past.To those who complain about incompatibility of the book and film, looking for help. There are probably few things that work in the book, which will either be boring and too much screen time to explain, or will be seen as a cliche of modern screen audiences. As I recall, I liked the book, and I definitely like this movie. I see a movie adaptation of the book as an interpretation rather than a translation from words to images anyway.As for realism, most of the scenes are unlikely to super-gadgets, is to be seen, not beautiful models fall madly in bed with Bourne and hero shows clear signs of physical vulnerability despite a very high level of training and competance. As someone who trained in martial arts for over 10 years, unrealistic fight scenes pet peeve. Fighting in Bournemouth is fast, nasty, and very realistic, while still fun for the layman. (And yes, with a gun away from a foolish man, which is well within your striking radius without getting shot is certainly doable, but I have serious doubts if we tested him with plastic dart guns in the dojo a few years ago). While not perfect, Bourne Identity, simply put, some departments on a typical spy movie. It focuses on the individual level, rather than their great political consequences that lends another layer of prestige, rather than detracting as some comments imply, because it remains a problem in an understandable human scale . Puzzles that remains is more secret Born of us, and I think it should be seen as a deliberate gaps as loose ends. The injustices are limited and the realism high as possible, while still spectacular enough to meet the expectations of the genre.
Year: 2012 Genre: Crime, Thriller Director: Andrew Dominik Starring: Brad Pitt, Scoot McNairy, Richard Jenkins
Description: Dzeko Kogan's strongman hired to restore order after three dumb guys loot Mob protected maps, causing the local criminal economy collapse. Review: This film is made in a style that was very unique edition of the standard shoot em up or Scorsese gangster film in a number of ways in which I found very refreshing. He slowed the pace of the dialogue scenes to a level understandable and believable violence more realistic and do not overdo the music. Those who can not handle too much or realistic violence will not like this movie.Some can feel the dialogue, the film drags a bit, but if you want realistic films, they made you feel like you put real conversations. The scenes and the songs are long, but they are animated with a fairly constant thought of the characters. James Gandolfini tagarelam was a bit more, but I think it was the violence point.The can be summarized as sentimental, many of which can be set by the conquest played hard not to fall out. Hollywood cliché? There are no heroes in this film as a director is not cheap tricks like voice recordings, screen time or disproportionately happy music to convict a criminal penalty for turning on the other. There demonization or glorification of violence, as proposed without the influence of music, and the audience can decide on what is displayed. No shooting Schwartzenegger style, as violence is usually sudden and violent, but high. Every shot is closer to as high as the real life in order a little push with every shot in range.The gun music to get down and get important to distinguish both violence and dialogue. Is there any song that gives the film a bit of energy, but in general, much smaller than the average Hollywood movie. It adds an element of uncertainty as the music does not give you what is happening in each scene (like a movie with the music of tension when something bad is going to happen, etc.). Foul Music can the public a look of neutrality in what they see, characters are allowed to be friendly without being good. This is the kind of film you would expect the hero was removed and just had the bad guys and the bad guys on it - it's much less annoying.
Year: 2009 Genre: Drama, Sci-Fi Director: Duncan Jones Starring: Sam Rockwell, Kevin Spacey, Dominique McElligott
Description: Astronaut Sam Bell has a typical personal meeting at the end of his three-year race to the moon, where he is working at his computer, Gerty sends back to Earth parcels source that helped reduce the problems of the planet that power. Review: Although the book racks filled with thoughtful, high-concept science fiction tend to be genre scannána population invading aliens, intergalactic war and adventure, making ÅŸtiu and required co-writer Duncan Jones Moon is much more of oddity.Not from Steven Soderbergh's much overlooked 2002's rendition of Stanislaw Solaris film is firmly rooted in Sci-fi area is thought to be delivered to the human condition, as deftly.It Moon tells the story of Sam Bell (Sam Rockwell), the only occupant of automated mining base removing lunar Helium-3 from lunar rocks to be returned to Earth for fuel energy injected planet.Sams isolated three-year posting is about to come to an end and yearn it to return to Earth to see his wife. His body is only about been staying Gerty, the bases Hal-like robot voiced by Kevin Spacey. Unfortunately for the last weeks and days turn out to be the most difficult, and Sam finds himself getting a little squirrelly, leaving him and the audience to wonder if what is happening is really happening or just a fun place stupid mind. Thats about as much plot details and I'm going to deliver in order to delve deeper into the story would give anyone too far away. Be prepared, but the thought-provoking story involving issues such as scientific ethics, corporate greed, the identity of the person and any foreign compassion.There, lasers / phasers, wormholes, warp engines or jump drive here, but lonely space age has concierge, unflappable monotone robot, and a whole lot of food for your brain to chow down on.This what was thought to be science fiction.
Description: First Black Ops agent assigned to protect a girl and hes fighting for survival after a surprise attack. Review: lackluster movie that can not decide whether it is a spy movie, horror flick or film noir. John Cusack is two words, which he ground randomly. female lead character is a wonderful blend of intellectual talent, skilled and clich d? Such helplessness is so outdated its laughable. Malin Ackerman is similar to the role, managing to wring out a little sympathy for his character, but for me it was a mixture disappointed he did not have a strong tendency to ; work with. Liam Cunningham called just that. I had little hope after which drew information about different interesting possibility familiar jaded spy-revelation-has-changes life-saving-script home, but murk ness, un-engaging flashback ness and poorly staged action followed. Its bad but not in a good way, and quite, quite morless. Process complexity do not you want to watch it twice or three times to figure it out, you know it ; like that because it will not fit, not because there is something more there. The plot is barely glimpsed, and not enough action case. Its possible to make timely, interesting, well-paced movies set in small areas stranger comes to mind-but this is not one thereof.
Year: 2004 Genre: Adventure, Comedy Director: Jeff Schaffer Starring: Scott Mechlowicz, Jacob Pitts, Michelle Trachtenberg
Description: Dumped by his girlfriend, decides a high school degree to embark on an overseas adventure in Europe with his friends. Review: First of all: Welcome to the inhabitants of Brussels sprouts somewhere in between, hahahaha. Thats right, I'm Belgian, you know, a place that no one knows, not even the Europeans ... Despite being expected to really hate this movie, I must admit that I had a lot of fun to watch. I loved that glorifies stereotypes French, English, German, ... and mocks the Catholic Church. Some people said that it was clear that the decision really did not know anything about the countries that are mocked. It's possible, but it does not bother you again. It's a comedy, not a passenger guide! This is how the story goes: Teenager dumped by his girlfriend on the day of graduation. We have to do with German girl named Mieke, but I thought it was a guy named Mike. Knowing this, and having seen the picture, I decided to pay him a visit in Berlin. But, of course, not just at the end of Berlin. They started the tour in London, then in Paris, Amsterdam, Berlin, Bratislava, and before ... The film script or the plot less completely covered by the organizers. It is clear that I just wanted to go to Europe to have some fun and entertaining film situation after another. I had a feeling that the majority of European viewers no matter what the subject of the film. Very rough and yes, it does not show anything that Europe really is, but it's also incredibly funny. I give him 8/10 for this.
Year: 2011 Genre: Action, Sci-Fi Director: Jonathan Liebesman Starring: Aaron Eckhart, Ramon Rodriguez, Bridget Moynahan
Description: U.S. Marine Corps squadron becomes the last line of defense against a global alien invasion. Review: I saw this movie the other day and I really really enjoyed it. That is exactly what I expected (maybe a little better). If you want to watch a movie really well thought out with great character development and an interesting subplots this is not the movie for you. If you want to see a bunch of U.S. Marines beat the tar out of spacefreaks invasion, then this is the movie for you. From the moment we first encounter with aliens, sometimes in the middle of the film is non-stop thrill ride. Explosive stuff, aliens spilled, burned by the laser beam. In case you did not already suspect this film is very violent. In the absence of blood, is certainly a lot of death. This action is unpredictable and funny. One minute everyone will go somewhere between point A and point B, the next, they're crouching behind a car and house burned out as aliens pouring into our Hellfire ungodliness from above. The special effects are also quite good except for a few bad pictures here and there. That being said, the film is when it slows down. The dialogue is poorly written and delivered decent, but not good. Aaron Eckhart, however, did a great job as a magnificent sea ice staff sergeant, who kept a cool head when the only place , ch. Most of the plot is fairly standard war movie / alien invasion stuff. You know, after a series of fights everyone is encouraged and give the driver a dynamic speech, and wonderful music filled and inspired everyone feel heroic. So do not expect a masterpiece of modern cinema, colon hope aliens and lots of shooting and I guarantee you will not be lost expectations.
6 
1
